The Convoy Effect in FCFS Scheduling: Understanding and Mitigating Performance Bottlenecks

Learn about the convoy effect, a significant performance issue in First-Come, First-Served (FCFS) scheduling. This tutorial explains how long-running processes can disproportionately delay shorter processes, leading to increased average waiting times and potential system inefficiencies.



Convoy Effect in FCFS (First-Come, First-Served) Scheduling

Understanding the Convoy Effect

The convoy effect is a phenomenon that can occur in First-Come, First-Served (FCFS) scheduling, where a long-running process at the front of the ready queue significantly delays shorter processes behind it. It's similar to a real-world convoy—a long line of vehicles can delay faster vehicles behind it. In this case, the long process is analogous to a long vehicle in a real-world convoy. The other processes are delayed even though they require much less processing time. This can lead to significant increases in average waiting time, a situation often referred to as starvation.

Example Illustrating the Convoy Effect

Let's consider three processes (P1, P2, P3) with the following arrival and burst times:

Process ID Arrival Time Burst Time Completion Time Turnaround Time Waiting Time
P1 0 40 40 40 0
P2 1 3 43 42 39
P3 1 1 44 43 42

In this scenario, the long-running process (P1) causes significant delays for P2 and P3, even though they have much shorter burst times. The average waiting time is high (39 + 42) / 3 = 40.33.

If the order of processes were changed (P2, P3 then P1), the average waiting time would be significantly less.

Process ID Arrival Time Burst Time Completion Time Turnaround Time Waiting Time
P2 0 3 3 3 0
P3 0 1 4 4 3
P1 1 40 44 43 3

Average waiting time: (0 + 3 + 3) / 3 = 2

This illustrates how the order of arrival in FCFS can drastically impact waiting times, highlighting the convoy effect.