The Convoy Effect in FCFS Scheduling: Understanding and Mitigating Performance Bottlenecks
Learn about the convoy effect, a significant performance issue in First-Come, First-Served (FCFS) scheduling. This tutorial explains how long-running processes can disproportionately delay shorter processes, leading to increased average waiting times and potential system inefficiencies.
Convoy Effect in FCFS (First-Come, First-Served) Scheduling
Understanding the Convoy Effect
The convoy effect is a phenomenon that can occur in First-Come, First-Served (FCFS) scheduling, where a long-running process at the front of the ready queue significantly delays shorter processes behind it. It's similar to a real-world convoy—a long line of vehicles can delay faster vehicles behind it. In this case, the long process is analogous to a long vehicle in a real-world convoy. The other processes are delayed even though they require much less processing time. This can lead to significant increases in average waiting time, a situation often referred to as starvation.
Example Illustrating the Convoy Effect
Let's consider three processes (P1, P2, P3) with the following arrival and burst times:
Process ID | Arrival Time | Burst Time | Completion Time | Turnaround Time | Waiting Time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | 0 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 0 |
P2 | 1 | 3 | 43 | 42 | 39 |
P3 | 1 | 1 | 44 | 43 | 42 |
In this scenario, the long-running process (P1) causes significant delays for P2 and P3, even though they have much shorter burst times. The average waiting time is high (39 + 42) / 3 = 40.33.
If the order of processes were changed (P2, P3 then P1), the average waiting time would be significantly less.
Process ID | Arrival Time | Burst Time | Completion Time | Turnaround Time | Waiting Time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
P3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
P1 | 1 | 40 | 44 | 43 | 3 |
Average waiting time: (0 + 3 + 3) / 3 = 2
This illustrates how the order of arrival in FCFS can drastically impact waiting times, highlighting the convoy effect.