CLR(1) Parsing: Constructing Parsing Tables for Compiler Design
Dive into the intricacies of CLR(1) parsing, a powerful technique for building parsing tables used in compiler construction. This guide provides a step-by-step explanation of the algorithm, including computing closures, constructing the DFA, and generating the action and goto tables for efficient compiler design.
CLR(1) Parsing: A Detailed Explanation
What is CLR(1) Parsing?
CLR(1) parsing is a powerful method for building parsing tables (used by compilers to analyze code). It's a type of LR(1) parser that uses a canonical collection of LR(1) items to construct the parsing table. LR(1) parsers are known for their ability to handle a wide range of grammars, unlike simpler techniques like SLR(1). CLR(1) generally results in more states (more complex table) than SLR(1) but can correctly parse grammars that SLR(1) cannot.
Steps in CLR(1) Parsing
- Define Grammar: Create a context-free grammar for the input language.
- Check Ambiguity: Ensure the grammar is unambiguous (each input string has only one parse tree).
- Augmented Production: Add an augmented production rule (e.g., `S' → S` where `S'` is a new start symbol and `S` is the original start symbol).
- Canonical Collection of LR(0) Items: Generate the canonical collection of LR(0) items (sets of production rules with a marker indicating the parsing progress).
- DFA Construction: Create a deterministic finite automaton (DFA) from the LR(0) items. This DFA guides the parsing process.
- CLR(1) Parsing Table Construction: Build the CLR(1) parsing table (an action table and a goto table) based on the DFA and the lookahead symbols.
LR(1) Items and Lookahead
An LR(1) item combines an LR(0) item with a lookahead symbol. The lookahead symbol is used to predict the next input symbol, which helps resolve ambiguities during parsing. The lookahead symbol is usually '$' for the end of input.
LR(1) item = LR(0) item + lookahead
Example: Building a CLR(1) Parsing Table
Let's assume a simple grammar (example grammar would be provided here). We'll follow the steps above. The process involves computing the closure (adding all related items) for each state and determining transitions based on the input symbols. The resulting DFA will guide the construction of the CLR(1) parsing table (action and goto tables). The action table dictates whether to shift (add to the stack) or reduce (replace symbols on the stack with a non-terminal).
(Example tables - I0 State, Transition Steps, CLR(1) Parsing Table, Action Table - would be included here)