Selenium vs. QTP (UFT): A Comparison of Automated Testing Tools
Compare and contrast Selenium and UFT (Unified Functional Testing, formerly QuickTest Professional), two leading automated testing tools. This guide highlights their key differences in features, capabilities, licensing (open-source vs. commercial), and helps you choose the best tool for your specific testing needs.
Selenium vs. QTP (UFT)
Comparing Selenium and UFT
Selenium and UFT (formerly QuickTest Professional or QTP) are popular automated testing tools. This comparison highlights key differences to help you choose the right tool for your needs.
Feature Comparison
Selenium vs. UFT Feature Comparison
| Feature | Selenium | UFT (formerly QTP) |
|---|---|---|
| License | Open-source (free) | Commercial (licensed) |
| Customer Support | Community-based support (forums, online resources) | Dedicated vendor support |
| Application Support | Primarily web applications | Web and desktop applications |
| Resource Consumption | Generally low | Generally higher |
| Supported Programming Languages | Java, C#, Python, Ruby, JavaScript, and more | VBScript (primarily) |
| Supported Environments/Operating Systems | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS | Primarily Windows |
| Supported Browsers | Wide range of modern browsers | Specific versions of major browsers |
| Object Repository | Not built-in; usually managed through code | Built-in object repository and recovery scenario |
| Browser Controls | Limited direct access to browser controls (back/forward buttons, etc.) | Can access and control browser elements |
| Test Report Generation | Often relies on external reporting tools (like TestNG, JUnit) | Built-in reporting capabilities |
| Parameterization | Requires using features from the chosen programming language | Built-in parameterization tools |